Conant’s mod-44 Kawauchi conjecture

About 20 years old · traced to

For every amphicheiral knot KK, does there exist f(z)∈Z[z]f(z)\in\mathbb{Z}[z] such that

∇K(z)≡f(z)f(−z)(mod4) ?\nabla_K(z)\equiv f(z)f(-z)\pmod 4\,?
References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

The conjecture has been proved: every amphicheiral knot has the required factorization modulo four.

The conjecture asks whether every amphicheiral knot has a Conway polynomial congruent modulo 44 to f(z)f(−z)f(z)f(-z) for some f(z)∈Z[z]f(z)\in\mathbb{Z}[z]. Conant proposed this mod-44 version in 20062006, after the stronger integral factorization statement was shown to fail.

Known results

  • Kawauchi and Hartley proved the exact integral factorization for strongly amphicheiral knots.
  • Hartley extended it to all negative amphicheiral knots using the JSJ decomposition.
  • Ermotti–Hongler–Weber produced a counterexample to unrestricted integral factorization; it still satisfies the mod-44 factorization.

2026 proof

Jim Conant’s arXiv paper proves that for every amphicheiral knot there is an f(z)∈Z[z]f(z)\in\mathbb{Z}[z] with ∇K(z)≡f(z)f(−z)(mod4)\nabla_K(z)\equiv f(z)f(-z)\pmod{4}. A separate announcement says the result was obtained using Fable 5 under human direction and verification.

Current status (as of July 2026): The mod-44 conjecture is settled for all amphicheiral knots by the arXiv proof; the stronger integral factorization statement remains false.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.