Glöckner–Neeb multiplication-growth question
Is the Glöckner--Neeb multiplication-growth condition automatic for every Mackey-complete continuous inverse algebra?
References
Primary source
Progress summary
A 2026 preprint claims a counterexample in an even stronger setting than the question assumes, but the result has not yet been independently confirmed.
The question asks whether the Glöckner--Neeb multiplication-growth condition is automatic for every Mackey-complete continuous inverse algebra. Glöckner and Neeb formulated the relevant regularity framework in 2012; their results gave sufficient conditions, not automaticity.
Known results
- Glöckner--Neeb, 2012: is regular when is Mackey-complete and locally -convex.
- The 2012 work does not establish that the multiplication-growth condition follows from Mackey completeness.
2026 counterexample
A 2026 arXiv preprint claims to construct a complete complex continuous inverse algebra whose unit group is not even -semiregular and whose multiplication-growth condition fails. Since completeness is stronger than Mackey completeness, this would give a negative answer; the same work claims infinite-dimensional positively graded examples with failure of -semiregularity for all .
Current status (as of July 2026): A complete counterexample is claimed in an arXiv preprint, so automaticity has a claimed negative answer; independent verification remains open.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.