Single-pass semi-streaming matching
Can a single-pass semi-streaming algorithm beat the naive greedy approximation for maximum matching?
References
Primary source
Progress summary
A 2026 paper proves that the simple greedy method is already as good as any single-pass semi-streaming method for this matching problem.
The question asks whether one pass over a graph, using only semi-streaming space, can beat greedy’s approximation guarantee. It had remained open since the semi-streaming model was introduced by Feigenbaum et al. in 2005.
Known results
- Earlier lower bounds successively ruled out approximation ratios above , , , and .
- The preceding blueprint-framework work ruled out every ratio above and identified the question as still open.
July 2026 resolution
The paper “Semi-Streaming Matching in a Single Pass II: Greedy is Optimal” proves that no deterministic or randomized single-pass semi-streaming algorithm for maximum bipartite matching achieves any constant approximation ratio strictly greater than with constant probability. Since greedy guarantees , it is optimal; the paper also derives the same barrier for online matching with preemption.
Current status (as of August 2026): The problem is resolved: greedy’s approximation is optimal for single-pass semi-streaming maximum bipartite matching, including randomized algorithms.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.