Carlson’s associated-prime depth conjecture
Is the depth of every finite-group cohomology ring realized by the dimension of one of its associated primes?
References
Primary source
Progress summary
A 2026 paper claims to disprove Carlson’s conjecture with a finite-group counterexample, but independent confirmation is not yet recorded.
Carlson posed the question in 1995: whether the depth of every finite-group cohomology ring equals the minimum dimension among its associated primes. The claimed example has
with the latter quantity at least .
Known results
- Green proved the equality for finite -groups attaining Duflot’s lower bound.
- Carlson established the case .
- Schäfer proved it when the Cohen–Macaulay defect is at most one.
- Garaialde Ocaña, González-Sánchez, and Guerrero Sánchez proved it for an infinite family of finite -groups.
2026 counterexample claim
The paper reports an exhaustive calculation involving rank-two elementary abelian subgroups and six centralizer types; every relevant centralizer has depth at least , ruling out associated primes of quotient dimension . A related paper reports the same obstruction. The counterexample is currently an unverified claim rather than a settled resolution.
Current status (as of 2026): The general equality is claimed false by a finite-group example with depth and associated-prime minimum at least ; independent verification and the broader mathematical status remain open.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.