The barrier for the -distinct language
Can the -distinct language be recognized by an acyclic NFA of size for some ?
References
Primary source
Progress summary
A 2026 preprint gives a deterministic construction that beats the long-standing four-to-the-k barrier, so the question has a positive answer.
The problem asks whether the -distinct language has an acyclic NFA of size for some . In 2014, the optimal base was explicitly described as open.
Known results
- Ben-Basat, Gabizon, and Zehavi: an acyclic NFA of size .
- The same 2014 work records a lower bound of states for every NFA.
2026 barrier-breaking construction
The preprint Breaking the Barrier for the -Distinct Language gives, for every , a deterministically constructible acyclic NFA with . Its fixed-histogram stage already gives ; compose-and-compress yields the final bound.
Current status (as of 2026): The existence of an acyclic NFA with size for some is established by the cited arXiv preprint; sharper constants and optimality remain open.
Sources
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.