Bellman’s lost-in-a-forest problem for the golden gnomon

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let G=conv⁡{(−c,0),(c,0),(0,s)}G=\operatorname{conv}\{(-c,0),(c,0),(0,s)\} be the isosceles triangle whose equal sides have length 11, whose base angles are 36∘36^{\circ}, and whose apex angle is 108∘108^{\circ}; this is the golden gnomon. For a convex forest KK, let an escape path be a rectifiable curve no congruent copy of which is contained in int⁡K\operatorname{int}K, and let E(K)\mathcal{E}(K) denote the infimum of the lengths of escape paths for KK. Determine E(G)\mathcal{E}(G) and an extremal path. Theorem 1.1 of the cited paper proves that, for the exact calibration parameters a,b,λa,b,\lambda defined in Section 2,

E(G)=C=2sc(b−ac+λ).\mathcal{E}(G)=C=2sc\left(\frac{b-a}{c}+\lambda\right).

The minimum is attained by the symmetric seven-piece path Γ\Gamma defined in equation (2), consisting of two segments, two circular arcs, two tangent segments, and one central truncating segment. Its exact length is

C=1.282676025459048056…,C=1.282676025459048056\ldots,

and the constant is transcendental.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A July 2026 preprint claims the exact shortest escape route has been found, but the result has not yet been independently verified.

Bellman’s problem asks for the shortest route guaranteed to escape a golden-gnomon triangle from any starting position and direction. The preprint claims the optimum is a symmetric seven-piece path of straight segments, circular arcs, and tangents.

Known results

  • Zalgaller’s construction gives the earlier benchmark, with scaled length 1.339146227260…1.339146227260\ldots.
  • Gibbs’s unproved “Tunnel” phase predicted that a shorter seven-piece route should exist.

July 2026 claimed exact solution

The preprint states that the seven-piece route is optimal and has exact escape length C=1.282676025459048056…C=1.282676025459048056\ldots, about 4.22%4.22\% below the Zalgaller benchmark. It characterizes CC using a uniquely isolated root of an explicit quartic and reports Lean 44 verification of finite certificates. The authors say Claude Fable 55, GPT 5.65.6 Sol, and Claude Opus 55 assisted with the search, exposition, and formalization.

Current status (as of July 2026): An arXiv preprint claims a complete exact solution with optimum C=1.282676025459048056…C=1.282676025459048056\ldots; independent mathematical verification remains outstanding.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.