Kemeny rank aggregation for three voters

About 25 years old · traced to

Given a set AA of alternatives, three linear orders ≻1,≻2,≻3\succ_{1},\succ_{2},\succ_{3} over AA, and a number bb, does there exist a linear order ≻\succ over AA such that Kemeny⁡2(≻)≤b\operatorname{Kemeny}_{2}(\succ)\leq b? Theorem 1 states that KEMENY SCORE with three voters is NP-complete.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

Two new papers report that finding the best combined ranking is computationally hard even with exactly three voters, resolving a twenty-five-year question if their proofs hold.

Dwork et al. (2001) established hardness for fixed even numbers of voters with n≥4n \ge 4 and asked about exactly three. The three-voter case was subsequently reported as NP\mathrm{NP}-complete via a reduction from MAX-CUT\mathrm{MAX\text{-}CUT}, so computing an optimal aggregate is NP\mathrm{NP}-hard.

Known results

  • Dwork et al., 2001: hardness for every fixed even n≥4n \ge 4.
  • The cases n∈1,2n \in \\{1,2\\} are easy.

July 2026 three-voter hardness result

Dominik Peters’s preprint reports NP\mathrm{NP}-completeness for Kemeny Score with exactly three complete rankings. An independent manuscript reports the same result, even under a strong pairwise restriction, and gives further complexity consequences. The first paper says the reduction was found by GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra and partly simplified with Claude Fable 5.

Current status (as of July 2026): Two independent arXiv manuscripts report a proof that the exactly-three-voter decision problem is NP\mathrm{NP}-complete, hence the optimization problem is NP\mathrm{NP}-hard; no part of the stated problem remains open.

  • GPT-5.6 SolOpenAIsolved2026-07-01evidence
Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.