Planar strictly convex hyperrigidity

Let KK be a Hilbert space, let X,YX,Y be commuting positive contractions on KK, and let P∈B(K)P\in B(K) be an orthogonal projection such that PXPPXP and PYPPYP commute. Let f:[0,1]2→Rf:[0,1]^2\to\mathbb{R} be continuous and strictly convex. Suppose that

Pf(X,Y)P=Pf(PXP,PYP)P.P f(X,Y) P = P f(PXP,PYP) P.

Does it follow that PP reduces both XX and YY? Equivalently, does it follow that

PX=XP,PY=YP?PX=XP,\qquad PY=YP?
References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A June 2026 repository claims an affirmative proof, but no independent publication has yet verified it.

The problem asks whether equality in the compressed functional calculus for a continuous strictly convex function forces the projection to reduce both commuting positive contractions. It is attributed to Boris Bilich and identified as Problem 2 in the CUHK-Shenzhen AI Math Problems database.

Known results

  • For every compact convex set K⊂R2K\subset\mathbb{R}^2, the affine operator system A(K)A(K) is hyperrigid in C(ex⁡(K))C(\operatorname{ex}(K)).
  • In strictly convex graph cases, the associated operator system is completely order isomorphic to ⟨1,t,f⟩\langle 1,t,f\rangle, extending earlier one-variable work of Brown.

June 2026 claimed proof

A repository claims that, for commuting positive contractions X,YX,Y, commuting compressions A=PXP∣ran⁡PA=PXP|_{\operatorname{ran}P} and B=PYP∣ran⁡PB=PYP|_{\operatorname{ran}P}, and continuous strictly convex f:[0,1]2→Rf:[0,1]^2\to\mathbb{R}, equality Pf(X,Y)P∣ran⁡P=f(A,B)Pf(X,Y)P|_{\operatorname{ran}P}=f(A,B) implies PX=XPPX=XP and PY=YPPY=YP. This would settle the stated problem affirmatively, but the claim is unverified.

Current status (as of June 2026): An affirmative solution is claimed, while independent verification and publication remain outstanding.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.