Erdős Problem #198 — Sidon Sets and Disjoint Infinite Arithmetic Progressions
The assertion is false: it is not true that every Sidon set has an infinite arithmetic progression with . Equivalently, there exists a Sidon set whose complement contains no infinite arithmetic progression.
References
Primary source
Additional references
Pinned Formal Conjectures source, Apache-2.0.
Progress summary
The conjecture is false: an explicit sparse set can hit every arithmetic progression, so its complement need not contain one.
The problem asks whether every infinite Sidon set has a complement containing an infinite arithmetic progression. The negative answer is attributed to Baumgartner, reportedly through Erdős and Graham.
Known results
- Baumgartner, 1975: enumerate all infinite arithmetic progressions, choose one rapidly increasing element from each, and the resulting lacunary set is Sidon while meeting every progression.
Explicit factorial construction and formalization
The set is reported to be Sidon and to meet every arithmetic progression, hence its complement contains none. AlphaProof is credited with finding this construction; Alexeev formalized it in Lean using Aristotle, with Claude assisting only with Lean translation. The formalization is public, but no peer-reviewed or arXiv proof was found.
Current status (as of June 2026): The conjecture has an explicit counterexample, supported by a public Lean formalization; the historical attribution and recent AI-associated account lack a peer-reviewed or arXiv publication.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.