Carbery’s almost-orthogonality inequality in
For p ≥ 2, does Carbery’s proposed many-function almost-orthogonality inequality hold with the pairwise overlap coefficients raised to the power 2? If not, what is the largest possible exponent?
References
Primary source
Progress summary
The proposed power-two estimate is false for every , and a June 2026 preprint claims the optimal replacement has now been proved for all such exponents, though that claim is unverified.
Carbery posed the underlying sharpened triangle-inequality question in 2006. The many-function problem asks whether pairwise overlaps may carry power and, if not, what the largest valid power is.
Known results
- Carbery proved the corresponding two-function inequality for characteristic functions (2006).
- Carlen, Frank, Ivanisvili, and Lieb established the general two-function refinement for real (2020).
- For any finite family, validity with overlap power requires , where .
- The three-function case has earlier bounds of Carlen, Frank, and Lieb, improved in the 2026 work.
June 2026 claimed all-real resolution
A June 2026 preprint constructs counterexamples disproving power for every and proves power for every integer . A later June 2026 paper claims, in a remark, a commutative proof of the optimal power for every real ; this is not independently verified here. The sources credit Grok with substantial assistance, including the counterexample structure and parts of the proof.
Current status (as of September 2026): Power is disproved for every , and power is established for integer ; a claimed extension to every real remains unverified.
Sources
- epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- scholarship.libraries.rutgers.edu
- terrytao.wordpress.com
- openai.com
- cdn.openai.com
- openai.com
- www-cdn.anthropic.com
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- cdn.openai.com
- cdn.openai.com
- cdn.openai.com
- cdn.openai.com
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.