Erdős Problem #146 — If HH is bipartite and is rr-degenerate, that is, every induced subgraph of HH has minimum degree ≤r\leq r, then ex(n;H)≪n2−1/r.\mathrm{ex}(n;H) \ll n^{2-1/r}.

About 42 years old · traced to

If HH is bipartite and is rr-degenerate, that is, every induced subgraph of HH has minimum degree ≤r\leq r, then ex(n;H)≪n2−1/r.\mathrm{ex}(n;H) \ll n^{2-1/r}.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A 2026 formalization claims to disprove the long-standing conjecture in every dimension covered by the problem, but the claim has not been independently confirmed.

Erdős’s conjecture, posed in 1967, asks whether every fixed bipartite rr-degenerate graph HH satisfies ex⁡(n,H)=O(n2−1/r)\operatorname{ex}(n,H)=O(n^{2-1/r}), including the r=2r=2 case.

Known results

  • Alon, Krivelevich, and Sudakov (2003): ex⁡(n,H)=O(n2−1/(4r))\operatorname{ex}(n,H)=O(n^{2-1/(4r)}) for every fixed bipartite rr-degenerate HH.
  • Alon, Krivelevich, and Sudakov (2003): the conjectured O(n2−1/r)O(n^{2-1/r}) bound holds when one bipartition class has maximum degree at most rr.
  • The conjectured bound is known for broad families, including rr-degenerate blow-ups of trees.
  • For r=2r=2, a C4C_4-free one-sided degree-22 case has a stronger bound O(n3/2−δ)O(n^{3/2-\delta}).

2026 refutation claim

A Lean 4 development claims that for every r≥2r\ge2 there is a connected bipartite graph of degeneracy exactly rr with ex⁡(n,Hr)≥cn2−1/r+1/(28r2)\operatorname{ex}(n,H_r)\ge c n^{2-1/r+1/(28r^2)} for all sufficiently large nn. If correct, this refutes the conjecture; the claim is unverified.

Current status (as of 2026): the conjecture is not independently settled, while a formalized 2026 development claims counterexamples for every r≥2r\ge2.

  • AstraOpenAIsolved2026-08-01evidence

    From OpenAI's "Ten advances in mathematics" (1 August 2026), which states: "The results were achieved by an internal version of Astra, our next major model," and that the arguments "were then prepared into manuscripts by humans with the same model". Claimed, not independently verified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.