Lichiardopol’s conjecture

∃g:N→N ∀k∈N ∀D (δ+(D)≥g(k) ⟹ ∃C1,…,Ck\exists g:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\ \forall k\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall D\ \bigl(\delta^+(D)\ge g(k)\ \Longrightarrow\ \exists C_1,\ldots,C_k vertex-disjoint directed cycles in DD such that ∣Ci∣≠∣Cj∣|C_i|\ne|C_j| for all i≠j)i\ne j\bigr), where δ+(D)\delta^+(D) denotes the minimum out-degree of DD.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new unrefereed paper claims the conjecture is proved, but no independent verification has been found.

The conjecture asks whether, for every k≥1k \ge 1, some minimum out-degree bound forces kk vertex-disjoint directed cycles with pairwise distinct lengths. Earlier literature records that even the case k=3k=3 remained open.

Known results

  • Strongly s(k)s(k)-connected digraphs satisfy the conclusion.
  • With sufficiently large minimum in-degree as well as minimum out-degree, the conclusion holds for k=3k=3.
  • For directed tree-width at most dd, the bound δ+(D)>(d+2)(k−1)\delta^+(D)>(d+2)(k-1) suffices.
  • The conjecture was partially verified for tournaments, regular digraphs, and digraphs of small order.

August 2026 claimed proof

An unrefereed arXiv manuscript claims the full conjecture, using butterfly minors, directed tangles, and directed flat-wall theorems. The scan found no independent exposition, verification, or published corroboration.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has a new unrefereed claimed proof, but its correctness is not yet independently established; absent that claim, only partial results are settled.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.