Montgomery’s Hamiltonicity conjecture for regular sublinear expanders
Montgomery’s Hamiltonicity conjecture for regular sublinear expanders
For every sufficiently large integer and every sufficiently large , every -vertex -regular sublinear expander contains a Hamiltonian cycle.
Progress summary
An unrefereed August 2026 preprint claims to disprove the conjecture by constructing regular expanders without Hamiltonian cycles at the log-squared degree scale.
Montgomery’s conjecture asks whether the relevant regular sublinear expanders universally contain a Hamiltonian cycle. The latest report says this universal statement is false and identifies the log-squared degree scale as an obstruction.
Known results
- Draganić, Montgomery, Munhá Correia, Pokrovskiy, and Sudakov, 2024: every sufficiently strong constant-expansion graph is Hamiltonian.
- Glock, Munhá Correia, and Sudakov, 2023: Hamiltonicity was proved under the weaker pseudorandomness condition .
- Montgomery, 2026 and collaborators: regular -expanders with are Hamiltonian when bipartite or -far from bipartite.
August 2026 counterexample claim
The preprint “Small circumference in regular sublinear expanders” reports a strong counterexample to the proposed universal Hamiltonicity statement, showing that the log-squared degree scale is a genuine obstruction. It is unrefereed, and the retrieved sources provide no independent verification.
Current status (as of August 2026): the universal claim is reported as refuted by an unrefereed preprint, while the counterexample remains unverified.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Additional references
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.