Gil Kalai’s Helly-Type Question for Two-Component Convex Sets
Gil Kalai’s Helly-Type Question for Two-Component Convex Sets
For integers and , let be sets, each of which is the union of exactly two disjoint, nonempty, closed convex sets. If, for every with , the intersection consists of exactly two nonempty closed convex components, must the total intersection also consist of exactly two nonempty closed convex components?
Progress summary
A 2026 preprint claims to settle the question positively in dimensions two and higher, while exhibiting a one-dimensional counterexample.
Gil Kalai posed this question in the Discrete Geometry meeting’s open-problems collection: does the required two-piece structure for sufficiently small intersections force the whole intersection to be nonempty? The claimed theorem gives a stronger conclusion, preserving exactly two pieces globally.
2026 claimed proof
Menara’s preprint claims that for and , it suffices to check intersections of sizes , , , and ; the full intersection then has exactly two nonempty closed convex components. The proof labels components over , uses triple compatibility, and applies Helly’s theorem. It also gives four subsets of showing that fails. No independent verification, objection, or retraction was found, so the claim remains unverified.
Current status (as of August 2026): The positive result is claimed in an arXiv preprint for , with disproved by an explicit example; formal acceptance and independent verification remain open.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Additional references
- A Helly-Type Theorem for two-component convex sets — arXiv — Menara, Giuliamaria
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.