Coppersmith small-root problem
Coppersmith small-root problem
Given a modular polynomial equation and the associated lattice-based Coppersmith method, determine the optimal asymptotic region of exponents for which roots satisfying can be recovered as , and prove matching upper and lower bounds for the method in general.
Progress summary
Recent work improves Coppersmith-style methods in specialized settings, but the general small-root problem remains open.
The problem concerns the general limits and optimization of Coppersmith’s lattice-based method for finding small modular polynomial roots. Recent results address narrower multivariate, implementation, and bound-analysis questions rather than proving a general theorem or giving a counterexample.
Known results
- A 2016 capacity-theory paper proves that broad auxiliary-polynomial constructions cannot generally improve Coppersmith’s univariate root-size exponent to .
2026 specialized improvements
A 2026 ePrint paper reports improved multivariate bounds and lower sample and lattice-dimension requirements in selected cryptanalytic problems, including a heuristic claim about a Boneh et al. conjecture; it does not address the general problem. A separate August 2026 report formulates bound analysis as linear programming and obtains improvements in several specialized settings, explicitly without solving the general problem.
Current status (as of August 2026): The general Coppersmith small-root problem has no reported proof, counterexample, or claimed resolution; only specialized improvements are established or claimed.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Additional references
- Automated Coppersmith analysis — IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.