Lehnert’s conjecture

For every finitely generated group GG, GG has co-context-free word problem if and only if GG embeds into Thompson's group VV. Explicitly, for a finite generating set XX of GG, the complement (XX1)WP(G,X)(X\cup X^{-1})^*\setminus\operatorname{WP}(G,X) of the word problem is a context-free language if and only if there exists an injective homomorphism GVG\hookrightarrow V.

Equivalent formulations 1

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. Lehnert's conjecture via the universal group QAut(T2,c)QAut(T_{2,c})

    The conjecture is equivalently formulated by replacing Thompson's group VV with the universal group QAut(T2,c)QAut(T_{2,c}): a finitely generated group has co-context-free word problem if and only if it embeds into QAut(T2,c)QAut(T_{2,c}).

    source: Background supplied with the source

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Partially solved

Recent work supports Lehnert’s conjecture and rules out several proposed counterexamples, but it does not prove the conjecture.

Lehnert’s conjecture asserts that a finitely generated group is co-context-free exactly when it embeds into Thompson’s group VV. Earlier work reformulated the conjecture using the universal group QAut(T2,c)QAut(T_{2,c}).

Known results

  • QAut(T2,c)QAut(T_{2,c}) embeds into VV, giving an equivalent formulation of the conjecture (2013).

2026 embedding results

Two 2026 papers characterize embeddings into VV through finitely many context-free subgroups or faithful context-free actions. They unify all previously known co-context-free examples inside VV and exclude, among others, Grigorchuk’s group, the Basilica group, and the Hanoï Towers groups; an independent proof by Henry Jaspars is also reported. The authors explicitly present this as evidence, not a proof of Lehnert’s conjecture.

Current status (as of August 2026): Lehnert’s conjecture remains open; substantial embedding criteria and exclusions support it, but no proof or counterexample has been reported.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.