Arveson’s hyperrigidity conjecture

Let AA be a unital operator algebra generating the C∗C^*-algebra B=C∗(A)B=C^*(A). If every irreducible ∗*-representation π:B→B(Hπ)\pi:B\to B(H_\pi) has the unique completely positive extension property relative to AA—that is, the only unital completely positive map ϕ:B→B(Hπ)\phi:B\to B(H_\pi) satisfying ϕ∣A=π∣A\phi|_A=\pi|_A is ϕ=π\phi=\pi—then AA is hyperrigid: every ∗*-representation ρ:B→B(Hρ)\rho:B\to B(H_\rho) has the unique completely positive extension property relative to AA.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

The original conjecture has a counterexample, while a new paper proposes a state-space replacement rather than restoring the failed claim.

Arveson’s conjecture concerned whether unique completely positive extension properties for irreducible ∗*-representations force hyperrigidity of a unital operator algebra. Bilich and Dor-On showed that this implication fails, and later work develops reformulations rather than reviving the original statement.

April 2024 counterexample and August 2026 amendment

  • In April 2024, Bilich and Dor-On gave an explicit counterexample: an algebra generated by a rank-one perturbation of a unitary is not hyperrigid in its generated type-I C∗C^*-algebra, despite the stated unique-extension condition. Later papers record this as a negative solution.
  • On August 19, 2026, Hridoyananda Saikia proposed a state-space-level amendment, relating Choquet-type maximality orders and deriving corresponding maximality implications. This is a structural replacement, not a proof of the original conjecture.

Current status (as of August 2026): the original conjecture is settled false by the Bilich–Dor-On counterexample, while Saikia’s state-space amendment remains a recent preprint-level claim requiring further independent assessment.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.