Graph parking-space extension conjecture

For every finite simple graph GG with distinguished vertex vv, let Autv(G)Aut(G)\operatorname{Aut}_v(G)\leq \operatorname{Aut}(G) be the subgroup fixing vv. Then the conjecture asserts that the restriction of the Aut(G)\operatorname{Aut}(G)-representation SlimG\mathrm{Slim}_G to Autv(G)\operatorname{Aut}_v(G) is isomorphic to the parking-space representation ParkG\mathrm{Park}_G: ResAutv(G)Aut(G)SlimGParkG\operatorname{Res}^{\operatorname{Aut}(G)}_{\operatorname{Aut}_v(G)}\mathrm{Slim}_G\cong \mathrm{Park}_G.

Progress summary

Partially solved

A new paper proves the conjecture for complete bipartite graphs, but the proposed extension to all simple graphs remains open.

The conjecture asks whether, for every simple graph GG with distinguished vertex vv, restricting SlimG\mathrm{Slim}_G from aut(G)\operatorname{aut}(G) to autv(G)\operatorname{aut}_v(G) gives ParkG\mathrm{Park}_G.

Known results

  • Berget and Rhoades proved the complete-graph case G=Kn+1G=K_{n+1}.
  • The conjecture is also known for trees and is described as easy for a single cycle; these cases are not attributed to named authors in the retrieved source.

August 2026 bipartite extension

Dora Woodruff’s paper, posted 15 August 2026, proves the complete bipartite case G=Kn,mG=K_{n,m} by constructing an explicit equivariant bijection. It formulates the general simple-graph statement as Conjecture 4.1 and reports computational tests, but leaves the arbitrary case open because suitable orbit representatives and a compatible partial order are not known.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture is settled for complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, trees, and a single cycle, while the case of arbitrary simple graphs remains open.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.