Ringel’s conjecture

nZ>0  T  ((T is a treeE(T)=n)(Gi)i=02n  [GiK2n+1GiT i{0,,2n},  E(Gi)E(Gj)= ij, i=02nE(Gi)=E(K2n+1)]).\forall n\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}\;\forall T\;\Bigl((T\text{ is a tree}\land |E(T)|=n)\Rightarrow\exists (G_i)_{i=0}^{2n}\;\bigl[\,G_i\subseteq K_{2n+1}\land G_i\cong T\ \forall i\in\{0,\ldots,2n\},\ \ E(G_i)\cap E(G_j)=\varnothing\ \forall i\neq j,\ \bigcup_{i=0}^{2n}E(G_i)=E(K_{2n+1})\,\bigr]\Bigr).

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

GitHub

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Partially solved

The conjecture is proved for all sufficiently large cases, but the full statement for every size remains open; a new formalization checks part of that large-case proof.

Ringel posed the conjecture in 19631963: every tree with nn edges should decompose K2n+1K_{2n+1} into 2n+12n+1 copies. The asymptotic theorem is established, but the supplied evidence does not establish the remaining all-nn statement.

Known results

  • Montgomery, Pokrovskiy, and Sudakov (20202020; journal publication 20212021): for sufficiently large nn, K2n+1K_{2n+1} decomposes into copies of every tree with nn edges.
  • Keevash and Staden (20202020): proved a stronger quasirandom-graph packing theorem, including the complete-graph case for sufficiently large nn.
  • Allen, Böttcher, Clemens, and Taraz (20192019): obtained probabilistic packing results for many random trees, not the full conjecture.

August 2026 formalization

Walid Elkersh’s repository machine-checks graph-theoretic and probabilistic components of the sufficiently-large-nn proof development. This strengthens verification of the asymptotic result but does not settle the full all-nn conjecture; independent review of the repository is not documented in the supplied evidence.

Current status (as of August 2026): the sufficiently-large-nn case is proved and partly formalized, while the full all-nn conjecture remains unsettled.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.