Hung–Martínez–Navarro conjecture
Hung–Martínez–Navarro conjecture
For every finite group , every prime , and every Sylow -subgroup , define . Then , with equality if and only if has a normal complement in , that is, if and only if there exists such that and .
Progress summary
A new unrefereed paper claims to settle the conjecture for every prime, but no independent confirmation has been found.
The conjecture concerns a lower bound and equality criterion for sums of squares of character degrees of finite groups. An earlier paper treated the statement as a general conjecture, while a note dated 15 August 2026 claims an unconditional proof.
Known results
- The inequality was known for through work of Hung, Martínez and Navarro.
- The earlier paper proved the inequality and equality characterization for , using the corresponding strengthening of the McKay conjecture.
- For general , the earlier paper reduced the inequality to Giannelli’s strengthening of the McKay conjecture and proved the equality case assuming that strengthening.
15 August 2026 claimed proof
The note On a conjecture of Hung, Martínez and Navarro claims, for every prime , that
with equality exactly when has a normal complement in . It says the proof uses the now-proven McKay conjecture and does not assume Giannelli’s stronger conjecture; the preprint is unrefereed and remains unconfirmed.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has a claimed proof for all primes, but its correctness has not been independently verified.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Additional references
- On a conjecture of Hung, Martínez and Navarro — arXiv — Stacey Law
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.