Generalized Gaifman Conjecture

Let TT be a countable complete theory and let PP be a distinguished unary predicate in its vocabulary. Assume that TT fails the Gaifman property; that is, assume that there exists a model NN of the theory of PP such that no model MTM\models T satisfies PM=NP^M=N. Then for every regular cardinal λ\lambda big enough, and every μλ\mu\geq\lambda, TT has 2λ2^{\lambda} models of cardinality μ\mu which are non-isomorphic over PP.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new preprint claims the generalized conjecture is false, but its counterexamples have not yet been independently checked.

The conjecture, associated with Shelah and Usvyatsov, predicts that failure of the Gaifman property forces many non-isomorphic models over a distinguished predicate. Its instability-to-nonstructure direction was previously open.

Known results

  • Under suitable stability over PP, including nn-stability for every n<ωn<\omega and very stable embeddedness of PP, the Gaifman property holds (2025).
  • The remaining implication was formulated as Conjectures 7.6 and 7.7 and left open (2025).

August 2026 claimed counterexample

Yi Zhang’s preprint claims a negative answer. It constructs a complete stable theory in the finite relational language L={P,E}L=\{P,E\} with, for every infinite cardinal κ\kappa, a model NN satisfying IT(κ,N)=0I_T(\kappa,N)=0 while IT(κ,κ)=κI_T(\kappa,\kappa)=\kappa; a second construction gives further failures of the predicted model-counting behavior. The claim is unverified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has a published partial positive theorem and a new, unverified preprint claiming counterexamples; independent validation is pending.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.