Almost-covering problem for Golomb-ruler difference packings

Fix an integer t≥3t\geq 3. For a tt-element set A⊂ZA\subset\mathbb{Z}, let Δ(A)={aj−ai:ai,aj∈A, ai<aj}\Delta(A)=\{a_j-a_i:a_i,a_j\in A,\ a_i<a_j\} be its set of positive differences. Call AA a Golomb ruler if all elements of Δ(A)\Delta(A) are distinct. For a family F\mathcal{F} of tt-mark Golomb rulers whose difference sets are pairwise disjoint and satisfy ⋃A∈FΔ(A)⊆[1,U]∩Z\bigcup_{A\in\mathcal{F}}\Delta(A)\subseteq[1,U]\cap\mathbb{Z}, define Pt(U)P_t(U) to be the maximum possible value of ∣⋃A∈FΔ(A)∣\left|\bigcup_{A\in\mathcal{F}}\Delta(A)\right|. The claimed threshold theorem is Pt(U)=U−o(U)P_t(U)=U-o(U) as U→∞U\to\infty if and only if 3≤t≤53\leq t\leq 5. For every fixed t≥6t\geq 6, the claimed obstruction is lim inf⁡U→∞(1−Pt(U)U)≥(t−1)γ0−22(t−2)\liminf_{U\to\infty}\left(1-\frac{P_t(U)}{U}\right)\geq\frac{(t-1)\gamma_0-2}{2(t-2)}, where x0∈(π,3π/2)x_0\in(\pi,3\pi/2) is the first positive solution of tan⁡x=x\tan x=x and γ0=−2sin⁡(x0)/x0=0.4344672564…\gamma_0=-2\sin(x_0)/x_0=0.4344672564\ldots.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new unrefereed paper claims to settle when collections of rulers can cover almost every distance, proving a sharp cutoff and a definite gap for six marks.

The problem asks when pairwise difference-disjoint Golomb rulers can cover almost all integers up to a large bound. Chaohang Ma and Xiangjie Yi claim the exact threshold: asymptotically complete coverage occurs precisely for 3≤t≤53\le t\le 5.

Known results

The preprint attributes the t=3,4t=3,4 cases to known perfect-difference-family existence results and the t=5t=5 case to Wild's product construction, recorded by Mathon, using perfect families at orders 121121 and 161161.

August 2026 threshold claim

For every fixed t≥6t\ge 6, Ma and Yi claim a positive-density uncovered set, with

lim inf⁡U→∞(1−Pt(U)U)≥(t−1)γ0−22(t−2).\liminf_{U\to\infty}\left(1-\frac{P_t(U)}{U}\right)\ge\frac{(t-1)\gamma_0-2}{2(t-2)}.

In particular, they claim an asymptotic uncovered proportion of at least 0.021542035264…0.021542035264\ldots for t=6t=6. The same paper gives a stronger large-tt obstruction, but explicitly remains unrefereed.

Current status (as of August 2026): The threshold theorem and the six-mark quantitative gap are claimed in an unrefereed preprint, but no independent verification is recorded; the mathematical claim therefore remains unconfirmed.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.