Atkinson-Lloyd conjecture for primitively intransitive spaces of linear operators
Atkinson-Lloyd conjecture for primitively intransitive spaces of linear operators
Let and be finite-dimensional vector spaces over a field . Let be a linear subspace of . We say that it is intransitive when for all , and we say that it is primitively intransitive when, in addition, there is no proper linear subspace of such that is an intransitive subspace of , where stands for the canonical projection.
Atkinson and Lloyd have proved that if and is primitively intransitive then . The conjecture states that the result holds without the cardinality assumption on .
Progress summary
No public proof or counterexample has been found, so the conjecture remains open when the underlying field is small.
Atkinson and Lloyd proved the dimension bound for primitively intransitive operator spaces when the field has at least elements; the conjecture asks whether that restriction can be removed. No posing date or resolution is recorded in the retrieved sources.
Known results
- Atkinson and Lloyd: if , then for primitively intransitive spaces.
2025 related generalization
A 2025 preprint gives a broader Atkinson-type bound under a corresponding field-cardinality hypothesis; for it recovers when , but it neither proves nor refutes the unrestricted conjecture.
Current status (as of August 2026): The cardinality-dependent bound is known, while the conjecture without the assumption remains open.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.