Reading–Segovia question on order dimension of posets of regions

Let A\mathcal{A} be a finite simplicial hyperplane arrangement of rank rr, and let W(A)W(\mathcal{A}) be its poset of regions with the standard region order. Is dimW(A)=r\dim W(\mathcal{A})=r for every such arrangement?

Progress summary

Solved

A new preprint claims the conjecture is false in three or more dimensions, with explicit examples, but its result has not yet been independently verified.

The Reading–Segovia question asks whether the order dimension of every simplicial region poset equals the arrangement's rank. Reading established this for most irreducible finite Coxeter types; the exceptional cases remained unresolved, while Segovia posed an analogous question for orientation lattices.

Known results

  • Types AA, BB, and DD: dimension equals rank (Reading and collaborators, 2003).
  • Supersolvable arrangements: dimension equals rank; type AA was previously proved by Flath (1993).
  • Earlier exceptional-type bounds included 6dim(E6)96\leq\dim(E_6)\leq 9 and 4dim(H4)64\leq\dim(H_4)\leq 6.

August 2026 counterexamples

A preprint by Daria Poliakova claims explicit counterexamples: dimW(H4)5>4\dim W(H_4)\geq 5>4 and dimW(E6)7>6\dim W(E_6)\geq 7>6, with computed values dimW(H4)=5\dim W(H_4)=5 and dimW(E6)=8\dim W(E_6)=8. It also reports 10dimW(E7)1110\leq\dim W(E_7)\leq 11 and says the obstruction subgraphs were found by ChatGPT 5.6 Sol Ultra. The claims are not independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The proposed equality is claimed to be disproved by explicit H4H_4 and E6E_6 examples, but the preprint remains unverified and general order dimension is open.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.