Tarizadeh’s Conjecture 5.8 on the maximality of purely-prime ideals
Tarizadeh’s Conjecture 5.8 on the maximality of purely-prime ideals
For every commutative ring , every purely-prime ideal of is purely-maximal; that is, is a commutative ring is a purely-prime ideal of is purely-maximal.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Additional references
- A counterexample to a question on the maximality of purely-primes — arXiv — Abolfazl Tarizadeh
Progress summary
A new preprint claims a counterexample to the conjecture, but no independent verification has appeared.
The conjecture asks whether every purely-prime ideal in a commutative ring is purely-maximal. The original paper presents this as an open problem and notes that a commutative counterexample seemed difficult to find.
Known results
- The implication holds for Gelfand rings.
- It holds for reduced -rings.
- A known noncommutative example does not resolve the commutative-ring conjecture.
August 2026 counterexample
Abolfazl Tarizadeh’s preprint claims a commutative ring with a purely-prime ideal that is not purely-maximal, disproving the implication. It attributes the result to ChatGPT Pro, but the counterexample remains unconfirmed because no independent verification or mathematical response was found.
Current status (as of August 2026): A commutative counterexample is claimed, but until the preprint is independently checked, the conjecture remains unresolved.
Purely-prime maximality question answered negatively
A purely-prime ideal need not be purely maximal
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.