Tarizadeh’s Conjecture 5.8 on the maximality of purely-prime ideals

For every commutative ring RR, every purely-prime ideal of RR is purely-maximal; that is, R(R\forall R\,\bigl(R is a commutative ringI(I\Rightarrow\forall I\,\bigl(I is a purely-prime ideal of RIR\Rightarrow I is purely-maximal))\bigr)\bigr).

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new preprint claims a counterexample to the conjecture, but no independent verification has appeared.

The conjecture asks whether every purely-prime ideal in a commutative ring is purely-maximal. The original paper presents this as an open problem and notes that a commutative counterexample seemed difficult to find.

Known results

  • The implication holds for Gelfand rings.
  • It holds for reduced mpmp-rings.
  • A known noncommutative example does not resolve the commutative-ring conjecture.

August 2026 counterexample

Abolfazl Tarizadeh’s preprint claims a commutative ring R=k[X1,X2,X3,]/JR=k[X_1,X_2,X_3,\ldots]/J with a purely-prime ideal that is not purely-maximal, disproving the implication. It attributes the result to ChatGPT Pro, but the counterexample remains unconfirmed because no independent verification or mathematical response was found.

Current status (as of August 2026): A commutative counterexample is claimed, but until the preprint is independently checked, the conjecture remains unresolved.

  • AI modelsolved2026-08-17evidence

    Purely-prime maximality question answered negatively

  • AI model (unspecified in the abstract)solved2026-08-17evidence

    A purely-prime ideal need not be purely maximal

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.