Cyclotomic conjecture

For integers n>2n>2 and k>1k>1, let Fn,k(x)=Φn(1+x++xk)Q[x]F_{n,k}(x)=\Phi_n(1+x+\cdots+x^k)\in\mathbb{Q}[x], where Φn\Phi_n is the nn-th cyclotomic polynomial. Determine, exactly in terms of nn and kk, whether Fn,k(x)F_{n,k}(x) is reducible over Q\mathbb{Q} and, in the reducible cases, determine the number of irreducible factors.

Progress summary

Solved

A new unrefereed preprint claims to settle the conjecture and rule out all relevant almost Moore digraphs, but the proof has not been independently verified.

Proposed by Gimbert in 1999, the conjecture predicts exactly when Fn,k(x)=Φn(1+x++xk)F_{n,k}(x)=\Phi_n(1+x+\cdots+x^k) is reducible over Q\mathbb{Q}, including the number of irreducible factors. In 2014, Conde, Gimbert, González, Miller, and Miret showed that it would imply nonexistence of almost Moore digraphs.

Known results

  • k=2k=2: proved by Lenstra Jr. and Poonen.
  • k=3k=3: proved by Conde et al.
  • k=4k=4: proved by Conde et al.; the exceptional reducible cases are n=3n=3 and n=6n=6.
  • Computational checks cover 2<i102<i\le 10 and 2<k2002<k\le 200 in related applications.

August 2026 claimed proof

Jaskaran Kaur and Hitesh Kumar claim the full factorization criterion and consequently nonexistence of almost Moore digraphs for d>1d>1 and k>2k>2. The arXiv manuscript is unrefereed, and no independent confirmation, gap report, or withdrawal was found.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains unverified; the only current resolution is Kaur and Kumar’s claimed proof, whose consequence for almost Moore digraphs therefore also remains unconfirmed.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.