Online discrepancy conjecture

Determine whether there exist universal constants C,c>0C,c>0 and a polynomial-time online signing algorithm such that, for every dimension n1n\ge 1 and every finite horizon TT, when v1,,vTv_1,\ldots,v_T are independent samples from N(0,In)\mathcal{N}(0,I_n), the algorithm chooses each xt{±1}x_t\in\{\pm1\} upon seeing vtv_t and satisfies P ⁣(t=1TxtvtCn)1exp(cn)\mathbb{P}\!\left(\left\|\sum_{t=1}^{T}x_t v_t\right\|_\infty\le C\sqrt{n}\right)\ge 1-\exp(-c\sqrt{n}). The algorithm should operate online and its guarantee should be independent of TT.

Progress summary

Partially solved

A new unrefereed manuscript claims the conjectured efficient bound for Gaussian inputs, but it does not settle the broader problem and has not been independently verified.

Gamarnik et al. (2022) conjectured an efficient online signing strategy achieving dimension-scale discrepancy for Gaussian inputs, with the analogous question for broader input distributions.

Known results

  • Bansal and Spencer (2020) obtained an efficient dimension-scale bound for Rademacher inputs.
  • Gamarnik et al. (2023) established geometric lower bounds showing that relevant online algorithms generally cannot beat a constant multiple of n\sqrt{n}, supporting the conjectured scale.
  • Vafa and Vaikuntanathan (2025) are cited for a conditional computational limitation against polynomial-factor improvement when TT is sufficiently larger than nn.

August 2026 claimed advance

Nicola Wengiel’s version-11 manuscript claims a polynomial-time algorithm for independent sub-Gaussian coordinates with terminal discrepancy O(σ8n)O(\sigma^8\sqrt{n}), uniformly over every finite horizon TT; for Gaussian inputs this reaches the conjectured O(n)O(\sqrt{n}) scale, up to a parameter-dependent constant. It also claims a masked-coordinate bound of O(σ8k)O(\sigma^8\sqrt{k}). The claim is unrefereed and no independent verification or objection was found.

Current status (as of August 2026): The Gaussian O(n)O(\sqrt{n}) target is claimed by an unrefereed manuscript, while the conjecture’s full generality and the claim’s correctness remain open.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.