Exact finite-energy fundamental limit for deterministic no-feedback AWGN coding
Consider the real additive white Gaussian noise sequence channel
where the noise coordinates are independent . An code has equiprobable messages, a deterministic encoder with codewords satisfying
no feedback, and an arbitrary decoder with average block error probability at most . There is no restriction on the number of channel uses or nonzero coordinates.
Polyanskiy and Wu observed in Remark 21.2 of Information Theory: From Coding to Learning that pulse-position modulation can be improved by subtracting its common center of gravity and rescaling, producing a regular simplex code. They conjectured that this simplex code is the actual optimal code achieving for every fixed and .
Equivalently, for , does the full-energy regular -simplex minimize the required total energy among all deterministic, equiprobable, no-feedback AWGN codes satisfying the maximal per-codeword energy constraint?
References
References
Yury Polyanskiy, H. Vincent Poor, Sergio Verdú, Minimum energy to send bits through the Gaussian channel with and without feedback. Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, Remark 21.2.
Progress summary
Two 2026 preprints claim that the full-energy regular simplex is exactly optimal, but the claimed proof has not been independently verified.
Polyanskiy and Wu posed the fixed-message conjecture in Remark 21.2: among deterministic, equiprobable, no-feedback codes with bounded individual energy, the regular simplex should minimize the energy required for a target error probability.
Known results
- Centering and rescaling pulse-position modulation produces a regular simplex, but its finite-message optimality was previously conjectural.
July–August 2026 claimed resolution and equality cases
A July preprint claims that the regular simplex maximizes decoding success for every signal-to-noise ratio and therefore gives the exact energy threshold, including the endpoint cases. An August preprint further claims that equality forces a centered full-energy regular simplex, up to relabeling and orthogonal transformations. Both are claimed proofs without independent verification in the retrieved record.
Community submission (unverified) — September 9, 2026
A submitted proof claims a stronger result and reports a Lean formalization, while saying that generative AI provided substantial help; neither the proof nor the formalization has been independently checked here.
Current status (as of September 2026): The simplex optimality conjecture has two claimed preprint proofs, including an equality-case claim, but remains an unverified claimed resolution.
Sources
- arxiv.org
- ocw.mit.edu
- web.mit.edu
- www-isl.stanford.edu
- arxiv.org
- en.wikipedia.org
- pure.tue.nl
- researchgate.net
- study.madeeasy.in
- ib-lenhardt.com
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- quantamagazine.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- quantamagazine.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- www-cdn.anthropic.com
- quantamagazine.org
- cdn.openai.com
- quantamagazine.org
Solutions 1
ProofPreprint of a stronger result I have obtained with the help of AI. A Lean formalization is included as well.See full solution
I have posted a preprint with a stronger result. I obtained it with the help of AI. A Lean formalization is included as well.