The two-attracting-equilibria conjecture for the glacial cycles model

From papers

Let

B={(w,η,ξ)R×[0,1]×[0,1]}.\mathcal B=\left\{(w,\eta,\xi)\in\mathbb R\times[0,1]\times[0,1]\right\}.

For the piecewise-defined system, call an equilibrium regular if it lies in its associated domain, boundary if it lies on the boundary between domains and is an equilibrium of the adjacent vector fields, and virtual if it is an equilibrium of a vector field but lies outside that vector field's domain. Two-attracting-equilibria conjecture. Varying the ablation parameters b1b_1 and b2b_2 while fixing all other parameters, the system has two attracting equilibria on B\mathcal B, and each equilibrium can be regular, boundary, or virtual. The conjecture is supported only by numerical simulations in the supplied text; no general proof or resolution is given.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Oleg Makarenkov and Esther Widiasih, “Bifurcation of Limit Cycles from a Fold-Fold Singularity in a Glacial Cycles Model”, arXiv:2511.02143 (2025).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.