Strong monotonicity conjecture for the glacier surface motion map

About 2 years old · traced to

Let r>2\textnormal{r}>2 be such that the Lipschitz continuity conjecture holds, set X=W1,r(Ω)\mathcal{X}=W^{1,\textnormal{r}}(\Omega), fix b∈Xb\in\mathcal{X}, and define

K={r∈X:r∣∂Ω=b∣∂Ω and r≥b}.\mathcal{K}=\{r\in\mathcal{X}:r|_{\partial\Omega}=b|_{\partial\Omega}\text{ and }r\geq b\}.

Let Φ:K→X′\Phi:\mathcal{K}\to\mathcal{X}' be the resulting well-defined surface motion map. Strong monotonicity conjecture. There exist constants α>0\alpha>0 and q>1\textnormal{q}>1 such that

(Φ(r)−Φ(s))[r−s]≥α∥r−s∥Xqfor all r,s∈K.\left(\Phi(r)-\Phi(s)\right)[r-s]\geq\alpha\|r-s\|_{\mathcal{X}}^{\textnormal{q}}\qquad\text{for all }r,s\in\mathcal{K}.

This coercive monotonicity would provide the key positivity property needed for well-posedness of the backward Euler variational inequality for glacier surface evolution. It is conditional on the preceding Lipschitz conjecture and is not resolved in the paper.

References

Primary source

Ed Bueler, “Surface elevation errors in finite element Stokes models for glacier evolution”, arXiv:2408.06470 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.