Strong monotonicity conjecture for the glacier surface motion map

Let r>2\textnormal{r}>2 be such that the Lipschitz continuity conjecture holds, set X=W1,r(Ω)\mathcal{X}=W^{1,\textnormal{r}}(\Omega), fix bXb\in\mathcal{X}, and define

K={rX:rΩ=bΩ and rb}.\mathcal{K}=\{r\in\mathcal{X}:r|_{\partial\Omega}=b|_{\partial\Omega}\text{ and }r\geq b\}.

Let Φ:KX\Phi:\mathcal{K}\to\mathcal{X}' be the resulting well-defined surface motion map. Strong monotonicity conjecture. There exist constants α>0\alpha>0 and q>1\textnormal{q}>1 such that

(Φ(r)Φ(s))[rs]αrsXqfor all r,sK.\left(\Phi(r)-\Phi(s)\right)[r-s]\geq\alpha\|r-s\|_{\mathcal{X}}^{\textnormal{q}}\qquad\text{for all }r,s\in\mathcal{K}.

This coercive monotonicity would provide the key positivity property needed for well-posedness of the backward Euler variational inequality for glacier surface evolution. It is conditional on the preceding Lipschitz conjecture and is not resolved in the paper.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ed Bueler, “Surface elevation errors in finite element Stokes models for glacier evolution”, arXiv:2408.06470 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.