Lusztig–Dyer combinatorial invariance conjecture for Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials
Lusztig–Dyer combinatorial invariance conjecture for Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials
Let and be Coxeter systems, and let and . For each pair, let denote the directed Bruhat interval, whose vertices are the elements between and in Bruhat order and whose edges are the directed reflection edges. Lusztig–Dyer's combinatorial invariance conjecture. If and are isomorphic as directed graphs, then
The conjecture asserts that Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials depend only on the directed-graph structure of the Bruhat interval, and is attributed in the source to Lusztig and Dyer. Its status is not specified in the supplied text.
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Equivalent formulations 1
Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.
Lusztig–Dyer combinatorial invariance conjecture for Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials
Let and be Coxeter groups, with and . Write and for the corresponding Bruhat intervals, and let and denote the Kazhdan–Lusztig and modified Kazhdan–Lusztig -polynomials. Combinatorial invariance conjecture. If as posets, then
or, equivalently,
The conjecture is known in several partial cases, including intervals of length at most , intervals in type , lattice intervals, intervals beginning at the identity, and further bounded-length cases. It remains open in general and would follow from sufficiently broad hypercube-decomposition results.
source: Margherita Zannoni, “Double shortcuts of standard hypercube decompositions”, arXiv:2605.13304 (2026).
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Maxim Gurevich and Chuijia Wang, “Parabolic recursions for Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials and the hypercube decomposition”, arXiv:2303.09251 (2023).
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.