The logarithmic double ramification cycle tautologicality conjecture

Let Mg,n\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n} be the moduli space of stable pointed curves, let Mg,n\partial\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n} be its boundary, and write

logR(Mg,n,Mg,n):=R(Mg,n),limPP(ΣMg,n)logCH(Mg,n,Mg,n).\log R^*(\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n},\partial\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}) :=\left\langle R^*(\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}),\varinjlim\mathsf{PP}(\Sigma'_{\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}})\right\rangle \subset\log\mathsf{CH}(\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n},\partial\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}).

Logarithmic double ramification tautologicality conjecture. The logarithmic double ramification cycle belongs to

logR(Mg,n,Mg,n).\log R^*(\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n},\partial\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}).

This is a logarithmic refinement of the double ramification cycle with improved functorial properties. The source attributes the statement to a conjecture of Möller, Pandharipande and Schmitt, while the cited work of Ranganathan, Holmes–Schmitt, and Holmes–Molcho–Pandharipande–Pixton–Schmitt is presented as proving it.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sam Molcho, “Pullbacks of Brill-Noether Classes Under Abel-Jacobi Sections”, arXiv:2212.14368 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.