Refined exponent conjecture for simple shapes

About 4 years old · traced to

Let Δ=(Ti,di,λi,ηi)1≤i≤k≠Σλ,η\Delta=(T_i,d_i,\lambda_i,\eta_i)_{1\leq i\leq k}\neq\Sigma_{\lambda,\eta} satisfy the setup and conditions of the cited theorems, and let R0(Δ)R_0(\Delta) be

R0(Δ):=12(N2−∑iTi2di2)+∑i(Ti2+12Ti(Ti−1)(di2−1))R_0(\Delta):=\frac12\left(N^2-\sum_iT_i^2d_i^2\right)+\sum_i\left(T_i^2+\frac12T_i(T_i-1)(d_i^2-1)\right) =Rˉ(Δ)−∑i(12Ti2di(di+1)−(Ti2+12Ti(Ti−1)(di2−1))).=\bar R(\Delta)-\sum_i\left(\frac12T_i^2d_i(d_i+1)-\left(T_i^2+\frac12T_i(T_i-1)(d_i^2-1)\right)\right).

Refined exponent conjecture. Under all the same conditions, the bound in Theorem may be tightened to

SΔ∣G∣(EP⁡λfn∞)=O(∣n∣R0(Δ)qS1A+Bκ).S^{|G|}_\Delta(\operatorname{EP}_\lambda f^\infty_{\mathfrak n})=O(|\mathfrak n|^{R_0(\Delta)}q_{S_1}^{A+B\kappa}).

The conjecture is motivated by the expected Gelfand–Kirillov dimensions of Speh representations; the paper identifies uniform bounds on local character coefficients as the main obstacle to proving it.

References

Primary source

Rahul Dalal and Mathilde Gerbelli-Gauthier, “Statistics of Cohomological Automorphic Representations on Unitary Groups via the Endoscopic Classification”, arXiv:2212.12138 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.