Monotonicity conjecture for normalized mixed-code sphere sizes

From papers

Let nn be the alphabet length, let srs_r denote the size of the sphere of radius rr, and let (nr)\binom{n}{r} be the binomial coefficient. The quantities sr(nr)\frac{s_r}{\binom{n}{r}} are defined for 1rn1\leqslant r\leqslant n. Monotonicity conjecture. The sequence

(sr(nr))1/r\left(\frac{s_r}{\binom{n}{r}}\right)^{1/r}

is decreasing for 1rn1\leqslant r\leqslant n. This would extend the endpoint bounds, which are attained at r=1r=1 and r=nr=n, and give a stronger monotonicity principle for the sphere sizes of mixed codes with finite alphabets.

Progress summary

Open

The conjecture remains open: known work proves endpoint bounds and a related monotonicity statement, but no proof or counterexample has been publicly recorded.

The conjecture asks whether the normalized sphere sizes (sr/(nr))1/r\left(s_r/\binom{n}{r}\right)^{1/r} decrease with rr. It is stated explicitly in the paper Bounds on Mixed Codes with Finite Alphabets.

Known results

  • Theorem 3 proves that (r+1)sr+1(nr)sr\frac{(r+1)s_{r+1}}{(n-r)s_r} is decreasing in rr.
  • Theorem 4 gives endpoint bounds for the normalized sphere sizes, with equality at r=1r=1 and r=nr=n.
  • The same source labels the requested monotonicity as Conjecture 5 and provides no proof or counterexample.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains unsettled; the related ratio monotonicity and endpoint bounds are proved, but the full sequence monotonicity has no publicly verified proof or counterexample.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Yonatan Yehezkeally, Haider Al Kim, Sven Puchinger and Antonia Wachter-Zeh, “Bounds on Mixed Codes with Finite Alphabets”, arXiv:2212.09314 (2022).

Solutions 1

Proof

Complete proof. Let q1,,qn2q_1,\ldots,q_n\ge2, put ai=qi1>0a_i=q_i-1>0, and let srs_r be the mixed-code sphere size. Then

sr=I{1,,n}I=riIai=er(a1,,an).s_r=\sum_{\substack{I\subseteq\{1,\ldots,n\}\\|I|=r}} \prod_{i\in I}a_i=e_r(a_1,\ldots,a_n).

Define

Er=sr(nr)(0rn),E0=1.E_r=\frac{s_r}{\binom nr}\quad(0\le r\le n), \qquad E_0=1.

Theorem 3 of the source proves that

dr=(r+1)sr+1(nr)sr=Er+1Er,0r<n,d_r=\frac{(r+1)s_{r+1}}{(n-r)s_r} =\frac{E_{r+1}}{E_r}, \qquad 0\le r<n,

is nonincreasing as a function of rr.

For 1r<n1\le r<n, it follows that

Er=j=0r1djdrr,E_r=\prod_{j=0}^{r-1}d_j\ge d_r^{\,r},

because every factor djd_j with j<rj<r is at least drd_r. Therefore

Er+1=ErdrEr1+1/r,E_{r+1}=E_rd_r\le E_r^{\,1+1/r},

and hence

(sr+1(nr+1))1/(r+1)(sr(nr))1/r(1r<n).\boxed{\left(\frac{s_{r+1}}{\binom n{r+1}}\right)^{1/(r+1)} \le \left(\frac{s_r}{\binom nr}\right)^{1/r}} \qquad(1\le r<n).

This is exactly the conjectured monotonicity for all alphabet sizes. Equivalently, it is Maclaurin's inequality for the positive numbers qi1q_i-1. Equality occurs precisely in the homogeneous case q1==qnq_1=\cdots=q_n.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·