The simply connected level-set conjecture for checkerboard switching

About 4 years old · traced to

Let R∈NpR\in\mathbb{N}^p, C∈NqC\in\mathbb{N}^q, and let M∈Mp,q({−1,0,1})\mathbf{M}\in\mathcal{M}_{p,q}(\{-1,0,1\}). For each integer ii, let Pi(M)\mathcal{P}_i(\mathbf{M}) denote the set of cells at level ii associated with M\mathbf{M}, and let Ci,i+1,k,k+1\mathbf{C}_{i,i+1,k,k+1} denote the corresponding elementary 2×22\times2 checkerboard move. Write A→A′\mathbf{A}\rightarrow\mathbf{A}' for the switching relation on matrices in M(R,C)\mathcal{M}(R,C). The simply connected level-set conjecture. We have A→A′\mathbf{A}\rightarrow\mathbf{A}' for all A,A′∈M(R,C)\mathbf{A},\mathbf{A}'\in\mathcal{M}(R,C) such that A′−A=M\mathbf{A}'-\mathbf{A}=\mathbf{M} if and only if both of the following conditions hold: (i) there exists T∈Mp−1,q−1(N)\mathbf{T}\in\mathcal{M}_{p-1,q-1}(\mathbb{N}) such that

M=∑i,ktikCi,i+1,k,k+1;\mathbf{M}=\sum_{i,k}t_{ik}\mathbf{C}_{i,i+1,k,k+1};

(ii) for every ii, each connected component of Pi(M)\mathcal{P}_i(\mathbf{M}) is simply connected. The conjecture removes condition (iii) from the preceding sufficient theorem and predicts that failure of simple connectivity is exactly the obstruction to universal switchability.

References

Primary source

David Ellison, Bertrand Jouve and Lewi Stone, “Switching Checkerboards”, arXiv:2212.07706 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.