Kinetic Poincaré inequality for higher-order Kolmogorov equations

About 4 years old · traced to

Let k≥1k\geq 1, d≥1d\geq 1, and let u=u(t,x1,…,xk,v)u=u(t,x_1,\dots,x_k,v) be a nonnegative weak subsolution of

∂tu+∑j=2k−1xj⋅∇xj−1u+v⋅∇xku=Δvu.\partial_t u+\sum_{j=2}^{k-1}x_j\cdot\nabla_{x_{j-1}}u+v\cdot\nabla_{x_k}u=\Delta_vu.

Set

Q~=(−2−κ,0]×BR0×BR0(1+κ−1)×⋯×BR0(1+κ−1)k,\widetilde Q=(-2-\kappa,0]\times B_{R_0}\times B_{R_0(1+\kappa^{-1})}\times\cdots\times B_{R_0(1+\kappa^{-1})^k}, Q1−=(−2−κ,−1−κ]×B1×⋯×B1,Q1=(−1,0]×B1×⋯×B1,Q_1^-=(-2-\kappa,-1-\kappa]\times B_1\times\cdots\times B_1,\qquad Q_1=(-1,0]\times B_1\times\cdots\times B_1,

and define ⟨u⟩Q1−=∣Q1−∣−1∫Q1−u d(t,x,v)\langle u\rangle_{Q_1^-}=|Q_1^-|^{-1}\int_{Q_1^-}u\,\mathrm d(t,x,v). Higher-order kinetic Poincaré conjecture. There exists a universal constant R0>0R_0>0 such that, for every ε∈(0,1)\varepsilon\in(0,1) and κ>0\kappa>0,

∥(u−⟨u⟩Q1−)+∥L1(Q1)≤Cε−1∥∇vu∥L1(Q~)+Cε(k+1)d∥u∥L1(Q1),\left\|(u-\langle u\rangle_{Q_1^-})_+\right\|_{L^1(Q_1)}\leq C\varepsilon^{-1}\left\|\nabla_vu\right\|_{L^1(\widetilde Q)}+C\varepsilon^{(k+1)d}\left\|u\right\|_{L^1(Q_1)},

where C=C(d,κ)C=C(d,\kappa). This would extend the trajectorial proof of the kinetic Poincaré inequality to the higher-order Kolmogorov equation; the general case remains unproved, with the trajectory construction and especially the analogue of property (iii) presenting the main difficulty.

References

Primary source

Lukas Niebel and Rico Zacher, “On a kinetic Poincaré inequality and beyond”, arXiv:2212.03199 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.