The (σ,ρ)(\sigma,\rho)-Poisson summation formula for automorphic representations

From papers

Let kk be the number field and GG a kk-split reductive group, with complex dual group G(C)G^\vee(\mathbb{C}). Let ρ ⁣:G(C)GLn(C)\rho\colon G^\vee(\mathbb{C})\to\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C}) be a finite-dimensional representation, let σAcusp(G)\sigma\in\mathcal{A}_{\mathrm{cusp}}(G), and let σ~\widetilde{\sigma} be its contragredient. Write Sσ,ρ(A×)\mathcal{S}_{\sigma,\rho}(\mathbb{A}^{\times}) and Sσ~,ρ(A×)\mathcal{S}_{\widetilde{\sigma},\rho}(\mathbb{A}^{\times}) for the corresponding Schwartz spaces, and let Fσ,ρ,ψ\mathcal{F}_{\sigma,\rho,\psi} be the (σ,ρ)(\sigma,\rho)-Fourier operator from the former to the latter. A k×k^\times-invariant linear functional is a linear functional invariant under the multiplicative action of k×k^\times. The (σ,ρ)(\sigma,\rho)-Poisson summation formula. For every such ρ\rho and every σAcusp(G)\sigma\in\mathcal{A}_{\mathrm{cusp}}(G), there exist nontrivial k×k^\times-invariant linear functionals Eσ,ρ\mathcal{E}_{\sigma,\rho} and Eσ~,ρ\mathcal{E}_{\widetilde{\sigma},\rho} on Sσ,ρ(A×)\mathcal{S}_{\sigma,\rho}(\mathbb{A}^{\times}) and Sσ~,ρ(A×)\mathcal{S}_{\widetilde{\sigma},\rho}(\mathbb{A}^{\times}), respectively, such that

Eσ,ρ(ϕ)=Eσ~,ρ(Fσ,ρ,ψ(ϕ))\mathcal{E}_{\sigma,\rho}(\phi)=\mathcal{E}_{\widetilde{\sigma},\rho}(\mathcal{F}_{\sigma,\rho,\psi}(\phi))

for every ϕSσ,ρ(A×)\phi\in\mathcal{S}_{\sigma,\rho}(\mathbb{A}^{\times}). This would generalize the classical Poisson summation formula and is intended to provide a harmonic-analytic framework for automorphic LL-functions and the Langlands program. The source presents it as a conjectural formula; no resolution is supplied here.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Dihua Jiang and Zhilin Luo, “Certain Fourier Operators and their Associated Poisson Summation Formulae on GL_1”, arXiv:2108.03566 (2021).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2021). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2108.03565.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.