Uniqueness conjecture for the annihilated Boltzmann hierarchy with hard-sphere interactions

About 7 years old · traced to

Assume that the collision kernel B\mathsf{B} is given by

\mathsf{B}(v-v_{*},\omega)=\frac{1}{2pi}\left|\left(v-v_{*}\right) \cdot omegaright|,

for (v,v∗)inR3timesmathbbR3(v,v_{*})in \mathbb{R}^{3}timesmathbb{R}^{3} and omegainS2omegain \mathbb{S}^{2}, and let Q\mathcal{Q} be the corresponding Boltzmann operator. Let f0f_{0} be a non-negative probability distribution satisfying the normalization condition. For the unique solution f(t)f(t) of the Boltzmann equation with initial datum f(0)=f0f(0)=f_{0}, define

nuk(t)=f(t)⊗k,tgeq0,kgeq1.nu_{k}(t)=f(t)^{\otimes k},\qquad tgeq 0,\qquad kgeq 1.

Uniqueness conjecture. The sequence bmnu∞=nukkbm{nu}^{\infty}={nu_{k}}_{k} is the unique solution in L∞([0,∞),X)L^{\infty}([0,\infty),\mathcal{X}) to the annihilated Boltzmann hierarchy in the sense of the stated weak-solution definition, with initial data nuk(0)=f0⊗knu_{k}(0)=f_{0}^{\otimes k} for every kgeq1kgeq 1. This uniqueness would yield propagation of chaos for hard-sphere interactions, extending the result beyond bounded collision kernels; the obstruction is the lack of a suitable uniqueness proof for the annihilated Boltzmann hierarchy, since the De Finetti approach fails in this setting.

References

Primary source

Bertrand Lods, Alessia Nota and Federica Pezzotti, “A Kac model for kinetic annihilation”, arXiv:1904.03447 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.