Bodine et al.'s conjecture on irreducible sign patterns requiring Hn\mathbb{H}_n

From papers

Let n3n\ge 3, let Hn={(0,n,0,0),(0,n2,0,2),(2,n2,0,0)}\mathbb{H}_n=\{(0,n,0,0),(0,n-2,0,2),(2,n-2,0,0)\}, and let an n×nn\times n sign pattern A{\cal A} require Hn\mathbb{H}_n when

Hn={ri(B)BQ(A)}.\mathbb{H}_n=\{\operatorname{ri}(B)\mid B\in Q({\cal A})\}.

A sign pattern is irreducible if it is not permutation-similar to a block upper-triangular sign pattern with more than one diagonal block. Bodine et al.'s conjecture. No n×nn\times n irreducible sign pattern that requires Hn\mathbb{H}_n exists for nn sufficiently large, possibly n8n\ge 8. This conjecture concerns the existence of sign patterns whose qualitative classes realize exactly the refined inertias in Hn\mathbb{H}_n; such refined inertias can signal the onset of periodic solutions by Hopf bifurcation. The source gives no resolution, so the conjecture remains open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Wei Gao, Zhongshan Li and Lihua Zhang, “Sign patterns that require H_n exist for each n4”, arXiv:1710.08955 (2017).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.