Asymptotic freeness of representation images of the canonical matrix

From papers

Let λ1(N),λ2(N)U^(N)\lambda^1(N),\lambda^2(N)\in\widehat U(N), for N=1,2,N=1,2,\dots, be two sequences of signatures satisfying the technical assumption of Definition regularity\mathrm{regularity}, and suppose that

limNmPP[λi(N)]=mi,i=1,2.\lim_{N\to\infty}m_{PP}[\lambda^i(N)]=\mathbf m^i,\quad i=1,2.

For each NN, let A(N)\mathbf A(N) be the corresponding non-commutative probability space, and let E(λ1(N))E(\lambda^1(N)) and E(λ2(N))E(\lambda^2(N)) be the representation images of the canonical matrix element. Asymptotic freeness conjecture. As NN\to\infty, the elements

1NE(λ1(N))and1NE(λ2(N))\frac{1}{N}E(\lambda^1(N))\quad\text{and}\quad\frac{1}{N}E(\lambda^2(N))

become asymptotically free. This conjecture predicts that matrix images arising from two independent representation factors exhibit asymptotic freeness, complementing the preceding result that their sum has a limiting distribution given by the free convolution of the corresponding limiting measures. The statement is presented as a conjecture in the source, and no resolution is supplied here.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Alexey Bufetov and Vadim Gorin, “Representations of classical Lie groups and quantized free convolution”, arXiv:1311.5780 (2016).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.