Asymptotic freeness of representation images of the canonical matrix

About 13 years old · traced to

Let λ1(N),λ2(N)∈U^(N)\lambda^1(N),\lambda^2(N)\in\widehat U(N), for N=1,2,…N=1,2,\dots, be two sequences of signatures satisfying the technical assumption of Definition regularity\mathrm{regularity}, and suppose that

lim⁡N→∞mPP[λi(N)]=mi,i=1,2.\lim_{N\to\infty}m_{PP}[\lambda^i(N)]=\mathbf m^i,\quad i=1,2.

For each NN, let A(N)\mathbf A(N) be the corresponding non-commutative probability space, and let E(λ1(N))E(\lambda^1(N)) and E(λ2(N))E(\lambda^2(N)) be the representation images of the canonical matrix element. Asymptotic freeness conjecture. As N→∞N\to\infty, the elements

1NE(λ1(N))and1NE(λ2(N))\frac{1}{N}E(\lambda^1(N))\quad\text{and}\quad\frac{1}{N}E(\lambda^2(N))

become asymptotically free. This conjecture predicts that matrix images arising from two independent representation factors exhibit asymptotic freeness, complementing the preceding result that their sum has a limiting distribution given by the free convolution of the corresponding limiting measures. The statement is presented as a conjecture in the source, and no resolution is supplied here.

References

Primary source

Alexey Bufetov and Vadim Gorin, “Representations of classical Lie groups and quantized free convolution”, arXiv:1311.5780 (2016).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.