The converse compactness assertion for composition operators on analytic Campanato spaces

Let CAp\mathcal{CA}_p and CAq\mathcal{CA}_q be the analytic Campanato spaces appearing in Theorem

, and let $C_\phi$ denote the composition operator induced by an analytic self-map $\phi$ of $\mathbb D$. For $(p,q)\in [0,2)\times[0,2)$ outside the parameter range covered by the converse part of Theorem

, namely

[0,2)×[0,2)([0,2)×[1,1](1,2)×[0,2)),[0,2)\times[0,2)\setminus\big([0,2)\times[1,1]\cup(1,2)\times[0,2)\big),

The converse compactness assertion. If the necessary condition (e1) and condition (e2) from Theorem

hold, then $C_\phi:\mathcal{CA}_p\mapsto\mathcal{CA}_q$ is compact. The assertion proposes that the converse part of Theorem

remains valid throughout this remaining parameter range. The paper presents this as an extension of the partial compactness result, while the precise conditions (e1) and (e2) are stated earlier in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jie Xiao and Wen Xu, “Composition Operators between Analytic Campanato Spaces”, arXiv:1207.5784 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.