Big-Line-Big-Clique Conjecture for planar point sets

From papers

Let tt and \ell be integers. For a finite set PP of points in the plane, two points are visible when the open line segment joining them contains no other point of PP; the visibility graph of PP has the points of PP as vertices and joins visible pairs.

Big-Line-Big-Clique Conjecture. For all integers tt and \ell there is an integer nn such that every finite set PP of at least nn points in the plane either contains \ell collinear points or contains tt pairwise visible points, that is, the visibility graph of PP contains a tt-clique.

This conjecture connects large collinear subsets with large cliques in visibility graphs. It is true for t5t\leq 5, but remains open for t6t\geq 6 or 4\ell\geq 4.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Equivalent formulations 1

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. The Big-Line-Big-Clique Conjecture for planar point sets

    Let PP be a finite set of points in the plane. Two points are visible if the open segment between them contains no point of PP, and the visibility graph V(P)\mathcal{V}(P) has vertex set PP with visible pairs as edges. Big-Line-Big-Clique Conjecture. For all positive integers kk and \ell there is an integer nn such that every finite set PP of at least nn points in the plane contains \ell collinear points or kk pairwise visible points, that is, a kk-clique in V(P)\mathcal{V}(P). The conjecture is true for k5k\leq5 or 3\ell\leq3, but remains open for k=6k=6 or =4\ell=4.

    source: Attila Pór and David R. Wood, “On Visibility and Blockers”, arXiv:0912.1150 (2009).

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Greg Aloupis, Brad Ballinger, Sébastien Collette, Stefan Langerman, Attila Pór and David R. Wood, “Blocking Coloured Point Sets”, arXiv:1002.0190 (2010).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2009–2010). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:0912.1150.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.