The exp-injectivity criterion for fat point schemes in the plane

About 19 years old · traced to

Let Z=∑imiPiZ=\sum_i m_iP_i be a fat point scheme in P2\mathbb{P}^2 for general points PiP_i, and suppose that h1(IZ(k))=0h^1(\mathcal I_Z(k))=0. Let μk(Z)\mu_k(Z) denote the multiplication map in degree kk, and say that μk(Z)\mu_k(Z) is exp-injective when it has the expected injectivity behavior. For a curve C⊂P2C\subset \mathbb{P}^2, write

C~=dL−∑iriEi\widetilde C=dL-\sum_i r_iE_i

for its strict transform on the blowup XX of the points PiP_i, and let δ(Cj,Z,k)\delta(C_j,Z,k) be the quantity defined in the paper for each component CjC_j. Exp-injectivity conjecture. The map μk(Z)\mu_k(Z) fails to be injective if and only if there exists a curve C⊂P2C\subset \mathbb{P}^2 such that C~=dL−∑iriEi\widetilde C=dL-\sum_i r_iE_i has ri≤mi+1r_i\leq m_i+1 and d≤k+2d\leq k+2, and

C=∑jnjCj,C=\sum_j n_jC_j,

where each CjC_j is integral, C~j\widetilde C_j is smooth and rational in XX, and C~j1⋅C~j2=0\widetilde C_{j_1}\cdot\widetilde C_{j_2}=0 for distinct components. Moreover,

∑jδ(Cj,Z,k)>2l(Z)−k(k+2).\sum_j\delta(C_j,Z,k)>2l(Z)-k(k+2).

This conjecture proposes that failure of injectivity is completely detected by configurations of disjoint smooth rational curves satisfying the stated multiplicity, degree, and numerical conditions.

References

Primary source

Alessandro Gimigliano, Brian Harbourne and Monica Idà, “The role of the cotangent bundle in resolving ideals of fat points in the plane”, arXiv:0706.2144 (2007).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.