The corrected Ruelle zeta-function rationality conjecture

Let qq be a prime power, let Tx(n)T_x^{(n)} be the Hecke operators associated with points xFq{0,1,t}x\in\mathbb F_q\setminus\{0,1,t\}, and let

D=(q+1Ttan)1.D=(q+1-T_{\tan})^{-1}.

Write D(n)D^{(n)} for the corresponding operator at the nnth iteration, and define

Corr(n,k)=(1qn)k(1qn)(1q2n).\operatorname{Corr}(n,k)=-\frac{(-1-q^n)^k}{(1-q^{-n})(1-q^{2n})}.

Corrected Ruelle zeta-function conjecture. For any x1,,xkFq{0,1,t}x_1,\dots,x_k\in\mathbb F_q\setminus\{0,1,t\} with k1k\ge 1, the series

exp(n1tnn{Trace(Tx1(n)Txk(n)D(n))+Corr(n,k)})\exp\left(-\sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{t^n}{n}\left\{\operatorname{Trace}\left(T_{x_1}^{(n)}\cdots T_{x_k}^{(n)}D^{(n)}\right)+\operatorname{Corr}(n,k)\right\}\right)

is a rational function.

The correction term is intended to account for missing fixed points in the proposed dynamical interpretation. The source reports this as a conjecture based on computer experiments; without the correction, the analogous series is generally only meromorphic rather than rational.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Maxim Kontsevich, “Notes on motives in finite characteristic”, arXiv:math/0702206 (2007).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.