The abelian/nonabelian correspondence for equivariant Frobenius structures

At least 19 years old · documented by

Let PP be the formal S{\bf S}-equivariant Frobenius manifold over N(X//G)⊗C[λ]N(X//{\bf G})\otimes{\mathbb C}[\lambda] defined by the genus-zero S{\bf S}-equivariant Gromov–Witten theory of X//GX//{\bf G}, with flat coordinates tit_i. Let NN be the formal scheme carrying the induced Frobenius structure from the abelian quotient, with flat coordinates sis_i, and let ξi\xi_i and F′F' denote its corresponding basis fields and potential.

Equivariant abelian/nonabelian correspondence. Let φ:P⟶N\varphi:P\longrightarrow N be the isomorphism of formal schemes over N(X//G)⊗C[λ]N(X//{\bf G})\otimes{\mathbb C}[\lambda] defined by φ∗(si)=ti\varphi^*(s_i)=t_i. Then φ\varphi induces an isomorphism of formal S{\bf S}-equivariant Frobenius structures such that φ∗(ξi)=σi\varphi^*(\xi_i)=\sigma_i and φ∗F′=FX//G,S\varphi^*F'=F^{X//{\bf G},{\bf S}} up to quadratic terms.

This is the equivariant formulation of the abelian/nonabelian correspondence: the Frobenius structure induced from the torus quotient is identified with that arising from the equivariant Gromov–Witten theory of the nonabelian quotient.

References

Primary source

Ionut Ciocan-Fontanine, Bumsig Kim and Claude Sabbah, “The Abelian/Nonabelian Correspondence and Frobenius Manifolds”, arXiv:math/0610265 (2006).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.