Universal optimality of the hexagonal, E8, and Leech lattices among periodic configurations

From papers

Let Λ2\Lambda_2, Λ8\Lambda_8, and Λ24\Lambda_{24} be the hexagonal lattice in R2\mathbb{R}^2, the E8E_8 root lattice in R8\mathbb{R}^8, and the Leech lattice in R24\mathbb{R}^{24}, respectively. Let f ⁣:(0,)Rf\colon(0,\infty)\to\mathbb{R} be completely monotonic and satisfy

f(x)=O(xn/2ε)as xf(x)=O\bigl(|x|^{-n/2-\varepsilon}\bigr)\quad\text{as }|x|\to\infty

for some ε>0\varepsilon>0. A periodic configuration has least ff-potential energy at its density if its ff-potential energy is no greater than that of every periodic configuration of the same density. Universal optimality conjecture. For n{2,8,24}n\in\{2,8,24\}, there exists a function hh satisfying the hypotheses of Proposition 10.1, or the proposition referred to in the source, such that hh proves that Λn\Lambda_n has the least ff-potential energy of any periodic configuration in Rn\mathbb{R}^n with its density. If true, these lattices would be universally optimal configurations in Euclidean space; the statement remains open in the source.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Henry Cohn and Abhinav Kumar, “Universally optimal distribution of points on spheres”, arXiv:math/0607446 (2006).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.