The Bloch–Kato formula for modular forms

For each prime pp, let Vp:=Vf,pV_p:=V_{f,\mathfrak{p}} be the pp-adic Galois representation attached to a newform ff of weight 2k22k-2, let Tp:=Tf,pT_p:=T_{f,\mathfrak{p}} be a stable lattice, and put Wp:=Vp/TpW_p:=V_p/T_p. Let Wp(j)W_p(j) denote its jjth Tate twist. Define

\textcyrSh(j)=Hf1(Q,W(j))/πHf1(Q,V(j))\operatorname{\textcyr{Sh}}(j)=\bigoplus_{\ell}\operatorname{H}^1_f(\mathbb{Q},W_{\ell}(j))/\pi_*\operatorname{H}^1_f(\mathbb{Q},V_{\ell}(j))

and

ΓQ(j)=H0(Q,W(j)).\Gamma_{\mathbb{Q}}(j)=\bigoplus_{\ell}\operatorname{H}^0(\mathbb{Q},W_{\ell}(j)).

Here cp(j)c_p(j) are Tamagawa factors and vol(k)\operatorname{vol}_{\infty}(k) is a real period. Bloch–Kato formula. With this notation,

L(k,f)=(c(k))vol(k)#\textcyrSh(1k)#ΓQ(k)#ΓQ(k2).L(k,f)=\frac{\left(\prod_{\ell}c_{\ell}(k)\right)\operatorname{vol}_{\infty}(k)\#\operatorname{\textcyr{Sh}}(1-k)}{\#\Gamma_{\mathbb{Q}}(k)\#\Gamma_{\mathbb{Q}}(k-2)}.

This is the explicit Tamagawa-number formulation of the Bloch–Kato conjecture; the paper discusses it as the arithmetic relation motivating its congruence results, while the normalization of the real period requires Deligne's treatment.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jim Brown, “Saito-Kurokawa lifts and applications to the Bloch-Kato conjecture”, arXiv:math/0512279 (2005).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.