Conjecture for the first two terms in the quadratic-twist vanishing ratio

From papers

Let EE be an elliptic curve of conductor QQ, let qQq\nmid Q be prime, and let S±(X)S^{\pm}(X) be the relevant families of fundamental discriminants with sign ±\pm. For λ=±1\lambda=\pm1, set

S±(X;q,λ)={dS±(X):χd(q)=λ}S^{\pm}(X;q,\lambda)=\{d\in S^{\pm}(X):\chi_d(q)=\lambda\}

and define

Rq±(X)=dS±(X;q,1), LE(1,χd)=01dS±(X;q,1), LE(1,χd)=01.R_q^{\pm}(X)=\frac{\sum_{d\in S^{\pm}(X;q,1),\ L_E(1,\chi_d)=0}1}{\sum_{d\in S^{\pm}(X;q,-1),\ L_E(1,\chi_d)=0}1}.

Also let

Rq=(q+1aqq+1+aq)1/2,R_q=\left(\frac{q+1-a_q}{q+1+a_q}\right)^{1/2},

where aqa_q is the qqth coefficient of the LL-function of EE. Conjecture for the first two terms. For qQq\nmid Q,

Rq±(X)=Rq1+38log(X)(β12±(q,1)1)1+38log(X)(β12±(q,1)1)+O(log(X)2),R_q^{\pm}(X)=R_q\frac{1+\frac{3}{8\log(X)}(\beta^{\pm}_{-\frac12}(q,1)-1)}{1+\frac{3}{8\log(X)}(\beta^{\pm}_{-\frac12}(q,-1)-1)}+O(\log(X)^{-2}),

where β12±(q,λ)\beta^{\pm}_{-\frac12}(q,\lambda) is given explicitly in the source, and the implied constant depends on EE and qq, hence also on aqa_q. This refines the predicted limiting ratio by specifying its first correction in powers of 1/logX1/\log X, based on conjectural moment asymptotics; no resolution is given in the supplied text.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

J. Brian Conrey, Atul Pokharel, Michael O. Rubinstein and Mark Watkins, “Secondary terms in the number of vanishings of quadratic twists of elliptic curve L-functions”, arXiv:math/0509059 (2006).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.