Langlands correspondence for over imaginary quadratic fields
Langlands correspondence for over imaginary quadratic fields
Let be an imaginary quadratic field, and let be a cuspidal automorphic representation of as in Taylor's theorem, but without assuming that its central character is invariant under the nontrivial automorphism of or that the integer in its Langlands parameter is even. For each prime of the coefficient field, let
be the associated Galois representation.
Langlands correspondence for . The representation exists as above, is potentially semistable at every place , and its associated representation of the Weil–Deligne group satisfies the local Langlands correspondence with the representation .
This is the conjectural extension of Taylor's construction of Galois representations to general cuspidal automorphic representations in this setting. It is intended to provide finer control at ramified places and at primes dividing the residue characteristic; the source gives no resolution.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Frank Calegari and Nathan M Dunfield, “Automorphic forms and rational homology 3–spheres”, arXiv:math/0508271 (2009).
Progress summary
The unrestricted version remains open: earlier work handles important special cases, but no complete proof or counterexample was found.
The conjecture extends Taylor’s construction of Galois representations from suitable cuspidal representations of to arbitrary ones, including non-invariant central character and odd parameter weight. It also predicts potential semistability and local Langlands compatibility.
Known results
- Taylor’s theorem constructs compatible systems under the hypothesis .
- Berger and Harcos construct representations under the same central-character hypothesis, with Hecke–Frobenius compatibility outside an explicit finite set.
- Taylor and collaborators prove local-global compatibility for regular algebraic, essentially conjugate-self-dual representations over CM fields, which remains a restricted setting.
Current status (as of August 2026): The correspondence is established only in restricted cases, notably when or under essential conjugate self-duality; the unrestricted statement remains open.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.