The Stanley-Wilf limit and longest-pattern-avoiding-subsequence constant conjecture

Let A{\mathcal A} be a proper pattern avoidance class, let Sn{\mathcal S}_n be the permutations of length nn, and let LA(Πn)L_{\mathcal A}(\Pi_n) be the length of a longest subsequence of a uniformly random permutation d560nd560_n whose pattern belongs to A{\mathcal A}. Define

sA=lim supnSnA1/ns_{\mathcal A}=\limsup_{n\to\infty}|{\mathcal S}_n\cap{\mathcal A}|^{1/n}

and

2cA=lim supnELA(Πn)n.2\sqrt{c_{\mathcal A}}=\limsup_{n\to\infty}\frac{\mathbf{E}L_{\mathcal A}(\Pi_n)}{\sqrt n}.

The Stanley-Wilf and subsequence-constant conjecture. Both limit superiors are actual limits, and

cA=sA.c_{\mathcal A}=s_{\mathcal A}.

The conjecture is motivated by the known existence of the relevant limits for sum- or difference-closed pattern classes and by the increasing-permutation class, but the paper describes the general evidence as fragmentary.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Michael H. Albert, “On the length of the longest subsequence avoiding an arbitrary pattern in a random permutation”, arXiv:math/0505485 (2005).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.